Baseball season begins with tax Dodgers and spring training surcharges
Friday, February 26, 2010
Some high, hard pitches are being thrown in connection with a couple of Major League Baseball teams, but they're not part of spring training drills.
The nastiest knuckleball so far has been fired by Jamie McCourt.
The estranged wife of Los Angeles Dodgers owner Frank McCourt (she contends California's community property law makes her co-owner, a claim the court will decide) has revealed how she says the couple avoided taxes on millions.
As part of their divorce proceedings now ongoing in California, she's filed court documents that indicate the couple had joint income of $108 million from 2004 through 2009.
The taxes, both federal and state, paid on that hefty sum? None, nada, zip, zero and nil.
Let's just read how Mrs. McCourt's filing explains it:
Furthermore, those funds were not reduced by any income tax obligations because the parties have not paid any federal or California income taxes since they moved to California in 2004.
The italicized emphasis is Mrs. McCourt's. Nice of her attorney to make sure no one missed that proclamation.
The paperwork also indicates that the now-feuding couple deliberately structured their business at least partially to allow them to live tax-free. Again, from the filing with the court:
The enormous wealth accumulated by Frank and Jamie McCourt during their 30-year marriage enabled them to live an extraordinarily lavish lifestyle. Their lifestyle was not funded only by the income sources described above. In large part, it was funded in a relatively unique manner -- through a series of capital events, including the "monetization" of future income streams from the parties' businesses. ...
During the marriage, funds, assets and debts were transferred at will among that myriad of inter-related entities, whenever deemed advisable in order to achieve the three primary goals of the McCourt Enterprise: first, to maximize the available ownership distributions to the parties; second, to attempt to ensure that such distributions would not create any income tax liability for the parties; and, third, to increase the overall value of the McCourt Enterprise.
Mr. McCourt's counsel didn't directly dispute the missus' characterizations of the couple's tax planning or the details of their finances, reports L.A. Times business writer Michael Hiltzik. The attorney did, however, call her document filings "selective."
McCourt has said repeatedly that the divorce "has no bearing on the club whatsoever." As more personal and business dealings come to light in that California divorce court, it will be interesting to see if that holds true.
Cubs ticket surtax: Just to the east, another MLB tax battle is shaping up involving the Chicago Cubs.
Some Arizona lawmakers want an 8 percent surcharge on spring training games to help pay for the Cubs' new digs in Mesa.
Some other clubs that spend baseball's preseason in the Grand Canyon State are calling the move foul.
The Cubs' cross-town rivals, the White Sox, and the Arizona Diamondbacks say that their fans shouldn't have to pay higher ticket prices to benefit the Cubs. Major League Baseball also is opposed to the added ticket tax, which is part of a bill that also would add an extra $1 fee on cars rented in Maricopa County where most of the Cactus League teams are headquartered.
One of the bill's sponsors says the Cubs deserve the $58 million that the state would contribute to the project because thousands of Cubs fans visit Arizona every spring. Those fans also attend games at other teams' stadiums when the Cubbies visit and spend money there.
Another reason Arizona lawmakers are looking to make the Cubs feel at home is that the team is being courted by the cross-country Grapefruit League. Naples, Fla., has been trying to get the team to move its spring training operations there.
At this rate, we might see MLB expand team rosters to make room for tax attorneys in the dugouts!
Related posts:- 'Taxpayer Field' opening in 2009?
- Tax hikes could affect MLB deals
- Baseball bids benefit IRS
- Tax issues surrounding Ortiz/Yankees curse jersey
- IRS now interested in Clemens
- Rollie fingered as tax deadbeat
- Tax protester tactic no 'Miracle'
- Reason #8,473 why I hate the Yankees
- Tax evasion plea is latest in Yankees' list of woes
- Yankees' Jeter off NY state tax hook
- Soccer wives gossip leads to tax inquiry
Want to tell your friends about this blog post? Click the Tweet This or Digg This buttons below or use the Share This icon to spread the word via e-mail, Facebook and other popular applications. Thanks!
I had heard about Frank McCourt long time ago,he is a rich person,..This issue is quite interesting!!lol!
Posted by: personal trainer az | Wednesday, March 03, 2010 at 05:36 AM
Kay - Being in SoCal, I'm familiar with the McCourt's drama. But I had no idea about this situation with their taxes. So....basically they have been avoiding paying taxes for 5 years. I don't understand how this is possible. What will happen now that this is public?
Posted by: Wes Masters | Saturday, February 27, 2010 at 06:27 PM