Fading 401(k) company matches
More money for IRS enforcement

Ensign, his mistress and gift taxes

John_ensign (2) So Nevada Sen. John Ensign's parents helped pay off his girlfriend and her husband. Can this story get any ickier?

Forget I asked that. Having watched for years politicians do incredibly stupid things, the answer is yes, it could get more sordid.

In today's Capitol Hill soap opera installment, we learned that Ensign's folks gave his mistress and her family a total of $96,000.

But before we go any further, here's a quick recap:

  • The married Ensign had an affair with Cindy Hampton.
  • She was a campaign staffer at the time.
  • Oh yeah, Cindy also was married when she had the fling.
  • And oh yeah, her husband, Doug, was Ensign's administrative assistant.

Plus, in true TV daytime drama fashion, the Ensign family and the Hamptons were "longtime friends."

That friendship, say Ensign apologists, is why the 96 grand that the Hampton family got from the Senator's family is no big deal.

Hey, where can I get me some friends like that?

Gift tax exclusion issues: This latest revelation about the Republican lawmaker's affair also raises an interesting tax issue. Yep, the tax code was a consideration in Ensign's adultery.

According to the Senator's lawyer, the $96,000 given to Cindy and Doug Hampton and their two kids was done in a way to comply with gift tax laws.

Specifically, the Hamptons got the money in $12,000 increments.

A tax code provision allows anyone to give anyone else up to a certain amount of money without causing any immediate tax concerns for the giver. The Ensigns' $12,000 gifts indicate that they gave the Hamptons the money in 2008. That was the gift tax exclusion limit last year. For 2009, it was bumped up to $13,000.

As for the recipients, they don't have to worry about the IRS. Gifts are not taxable.

So Ensign's mom gave Cindy, Doug and their two kids $12,000 each, totaling $48,000. And Ensign's dad gave Cindy, Doug and the two kids $12,000 each, totaling $48,000.

$48,000 + $48,000 = $96,000.

And I thought it was just today's younger parents who clean up after their wayward children way too much.

Gifts and estate tax planning: The gift tax exclusion is a valuable tax planning tool for folks with large estates like, apparently, Sen. Ensign's folks.

If you have assets that are greater than the federal estate tax exemption (that's $3.5 million in 2009), you could get your holdings down to or below that figure by giving away some your assets to family and friends while you're still around to get their gratitude.

You can continue this munificent process with as many lucky gift recipients in the allowable annual amounts until your aggregate gifts reach that previously mentioned $1 million amount.

Once you hit that figure, then you've got some other tax considerations.

Of course, if you have enough money to be doling out sizable chunks of cash to family, friends and your child's lover, then you probably have a good tax adviser and/or attorney on retainer.

If, however, you're like the hubby and me and just want to know more out of curiosity, you can read about estate and gift taxes in these articles from the IRS, BankrateFairmark and SmartMoney. And this Don't Mess With Taxes item looks at possible estate tax changes (honestly, keep reading past the Michael Jackson stuff) expected later this year.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


You happen to be ill-informed on taxes?if yes, you'd rather go at any length to get a consultant expert or else your complains will pile up in the revenue authorities offices' files and will never be attended to.
Congratulations for the nice post anyway.


Can you talk more about the million? Only gifts above any $13K increments apply to the million, right? e.g., I give away $13K to 100 people, $1.3M. No issue. I give mom another $20K ($33K tot) and $20K applies to the million, right?

Silver Forecasting

Nice blog post great keep it up!

The comments to this entry are closed.